WARNING: This site is intended for online use only; mass-downloading of pages degrades the server and is prohibited.
If you attempt to use tools to mass-download the site, you may be blocked permanently by automated software.
If you want to read this CertiGuide offline, please use one of the links on the left to purchase a convenient PDF copy. Thank you.

Get this Security+ CertiGuide for your own computer.
Click Here!
Use coupon code "certiguide" to save 20%!
(Expires 2004/12/31)

Also available: 300-question Security+ practice test!
Get It Here!

Google
Web CertiGuide






Table Of Contents  CertiGuide to Security+
 9  Chapter 4:  Basics of Cryptography (Domain 4.0; 15%)
      9  4.2  Concepts in Using Cryptography
           9  4.2.2  Integrity

Previous Topic/Section
4.2.2  Integrity
Previous Page
Pages in Current Topic/Section
12
3
Next Page
4.2.3  Authentication
Next Topic/Section

4.2.2.1  Digital Signatures
(Page 3 of 3)

Confidentiality vs. Data Integrity



Note the difference between using asymmetric encryption for confidentiality and data integrity differ:

  • When using asymmetric encryption to ensure confidentiality, the message contents are encrypted with the receiver’s public key and decrypted with their private key.

  • When using asymmetric encryption to ensure data integrity, a digest of the message contents, not the message itself, is encrypted with the sender’s public key and decrypted with their private key.
Signatures and Non-Confidential Messages

You are not required to encrypt a message before digitally signing it. You can digitally sign an unencrypted message, thus providing a data integrity check without data confidentiality. If you look at the above steps to create and verify a digital signature, you see nothing about encrypting contents – the only data encrypted is the message’s hash value. Why would you want to do this? You might be sending out a security bulletin whose contents are meant to be public, and want receivers to be able to verify that the message came from a recognized authority and has not been changed since it was written. Again, note that the potential issues with hashing functions still exist – it is theoretically possible, though considered computationally infeasible, to come up with an alternate document which hashes to the same message digest value.

You can also combine both techniques to provide both confidentiality and data integrity.


Previous Topic/Section
4.2.2  Integrity
Previous Page
Pages in Current Topic/Section
12
3
Next Page
4.2.3  Authentication
Next Topic/Section

If you find CertiGuide.com useful, please consider making a small Paypal donation to help the site, using one of the buttons below. You can also donate a custom amount using the far right button (not less than $1 please, or PayPal gets most/all of your money!) In lieu of a larger donation, you may wish to consider buying an inexpensive PDF equivalent of the CertiGuide to Security+ from StudyExam4Less.com. (Use coupon code "certiguide" by December 31, 2004 to save 20%!) Thanks for your support!
Donate $2
Donate $5
Donate $10
Donate $20
Donate $30
Donate: $



Home - Table Of Contents - Contact Us

CertiGuide for Security+ (http://www.CertiGuide.com/secplus/) on CertiGuide.com
Version 1.0 - Version Date: November 15, 2004

Adapted with permission from a work created by Tcat Houser et al.
CertiGuide.com Version © Copyright 2004 Charles M. Kozierok. All Rights Reserved.
Not responsible for any loss resulting from the use of this site.