| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.2.2.1 Digital Signatures (Page 3 of 3) Confidentiality vs. Data Integrity Note the difference between using asymmetric encryption for confidentiality and data integrity differ:
You are not required to encrypt a message before digitally signing it. You can digitally sign an unencrypted message, thus providing a data integrity check without data confidentiality. If you look at the above steps to create and verify a digital signature, you see nothing about encrypting contents the only data encrypted is the messages hash value. Why would you want to do this? You might be sending out a security bulletin whose contents are meant to be public, and want receivers to be able to verify that the message came from a recognized authority and has not been changed since it was written. Again, note that the potential issues with hashing functions still exist it is theoretically possible, though considered computationally infeasible, to come up with an alternate document which hashes to the same message digest value. You can also combine both techniques to provide both confidentiality and data integrity.
Home - Table Of Contents - Contact Us CertiGuide for Security+ (http://www.CertiGuide.com/secplus/) on CertiGuide.com Version 1.0 - Version Date: November 15, 2004 Adapted with permission from a work created by Tcat Houser et al. CertiGuide.com Version © Copyright 2004 Charles M. Kozierok. All Rights Reserved. Not responsible for any loss resulting from the use of this site. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||